{"id":90,"date":"2016-11-17T21:05:01","date_gmt":"2016-11-17T19:05:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/xn--urnalai-cxb.lmta.lt\/?page_id=90"},"modified":"2019-01-22T18:09:59","modified_gmt":"2019-01-22T16:09:59","slug":"lietuvos-muzikologija-atmintine-autoriams","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/xn--urnalai-cxb.lmta.lt\/en\/lietuvos-muzikologija-atmintine-autoriams\/","title":{"rendered":"","raw":""},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201eLithuanian Musicology\u201c is a periodic scientific journal of the humanities founded in 2000. Every year one volume of the journal is published. Editorial board includes authoritative scientists from Lithuania as well as foreign countries, humanitarians from institutions of different fields. Publications submitted to the journal must be fully original, never published before in other editions. While using other sources as well as other scientific material, the authors must invoke the rules of fair quoting \u2013 cases of plagiarism is unacceptable. The journal protects copyright as well as academic ethics standards. In turn, the editor and editorial board commits not to reveal any information about the submitted papers, with an exception of the author himself, co-authors, reviewers, potential reviewers and other persons related to the publishing (language editors, publishers and etc.). The journal applies the standard of peer review. Reviewers treat papers as confidential documents, peer review relies on the objectivity as well as the clear argumentation.<\/p>\n

In case of the author noticing fundamental errors left after his paper is published he is obligated to inform the journal’s editor and cooperate in the process of correction. The editors and editorial board is not responsible for the opinions, views and contents published in the submitted papers. The responsibility for the originality, veracity and errors lies on the author.<\/p>\n

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement<\/h3>\n

PUBLICATION AND AUTHORSHIP<\/h6>\n

* Editing and publication of the journal Lithuanian Musicology follows the established principles of the academic ethics.<\/p>\n

* Articles previously published elsewhere are not accepted for publication.<\/p>\n

* Plagiarism, i.e. wrong appropriation of somebody else\u2019s text, research methodology, ideas, or results, or presentation of empiric data that has already been introduced into scholarly circulation as new and freshly discovered, or purposeful neglect of proper references is prohibited.<\/p>\n

* The copyrights for all contributions published in the journal Lithuanian Musicology belong to the Lithuanian Academy of Music and Theater; the authors are granted exclusive right to use their works independently of this collective publication.<\/p>\n

* In case of special circumstances causing termination of the journal\u2019s publication, the archive of the former issues is to be preserved and freely available on the Institute\u2019s website.<\/p>\n

* Publication of articles in the journal is free of charge. Authors are not entitled for any financial remuneration for their contributions. A free copy of a relevant issue is provided to all the contributors upon publication.<\/p>\n

AUTHOR RESPONSIBILITIES<\/h6>\n

* Papers submitted for publication must meet the requirements of research publications and follow the editing principles specified in the Memo for Authors.<\/p>\n

* All authors listed on a paper must have made substantive contributions to the research and writing of the paper.<\/p>\n

* Authors must make sure that all data cited in the article are, to the best of their knowledge, real, accurate, and authentic.<\/p>\n

* Authors must make sure that all sources of financial support for research connected to a paper are acknowledged on publication.<\/p>\n

* Authors are required to take into account the reviewers\u2019 comments regarding soundness of their statements and conclusions, the level of analysis, and other motivated reviewers\u2019 opinions, and correct the indicated mistakes.<\/p>\n

REVIEWING AND THE REVIEWER RESPONSIBILITIES<\/h6>\n

* Research articles submitted for publication in Lithuanian Musicology are reviewed using peer review method by at least two anonymous reviewers, selected by the Editorial Board from the specialists in the corresponding field. If the reviewers present contrary opinions regarding suitability of the article for publication, the Editorial Board appoints a third reviewer, and after receiving his\/ her conclusions, makes the final decision.<\/p>\n

* The process of reviewing is double-blind, i.e. the reviewers are not aware of the authors\u2019 identity, and vice versa.<\/p>\n

* The reviewers must disclose to the special editor or the Editorial Board any potential conflicts of interest regarding the papers they are asked to referee, including concerns related to funding or their personal objections to the material in question.<\/p>\n

* Reviewers must alert the Editorial Board to any similar or related work already published, which is not cited in the paper in question.<\/p>\n

* Reviewers should treat papers under review as confidential materials. They must not discuss, distribute, or in any way retain copies of papers reviewed.<\/p>\n

EDITORIAL RESPONSIBILITIES<\/h6>\n

* Editorial Board has final authority to accept or reject a submission.<\/p>\n

* Editors are responsible for recognizing any potential conflict of interest with regard to a submission and should take appropriate action to ensure that these conflicts do not affect a submission\u2019s acceptance or rejection.<\/p>\n

* Editorial Board has to ensure an appropriate level of peer-reviewing and make unbiased decisions with no regard of possible inequity on the part of the reviewers, connected to the author\u2019s gender, sexual orientation, religion, political views and ethnic \/ geographical background.<\/p>\n

* Acceptance of a paper for publication implies confidence in and certainty (to the greatest extent possible) of the validity of the research contained therein.<\/p>\n

* If a material error is discovered in a published paper, the Editorial Board has to ensure that a correction, retraction, or apology, as appropriate and feasible, is published promptly.<\/p>\n

IDENTIFICATION OF UNETHICAL BEHAVIOUR<\/h6>\n

* Misconduct and unethical behaviour may be identified and brought to the attention of the editor and publisher at any time, by anyone.<\/p>\n

* Misconduct and unethical behaviour may include, but need not be limited to, examples as outlined above.<\/p>\n

* Whoever informs the editor or publisher of such conduct should provide sufficient information and evidence in order for an investigation to be initiated. All allegations should be taken seriously and treated in the same way, until a successful decision or conclusion is reached.<\/p>\n

BREACHES<\/h6>\n

* Minor misconduct might be dealt with without the wider consultation with author given the chance to respond to any allegations.<\/p>\n

* In case of serious misconduct the editor, in consultation with the publisher or Society as appropriate, should make the decision whether or not to involve the employers, either by examining the available evidence themselves or by further consultation with a limited number of experts.<\/p>\n

OUTCOMES<\/h6>\n

* In case of misconduct, the author or reviewer should be informed where there appears to be a misunderstanding or misapplication of acceptable standards.<\/p>\n

* The author or reviewer could be given a more strongly worded letter as a warning to future behavior.<\/p>\n

* A formal notice detailing the misconduct could be published.<\/p>\n

* A formal letter could be given to the head of the author’s or reviewer’s department or funding agency.<\/p>\n

* Formal retraction or withdrawal of a publication from the journal, in conjunction with informing the head of the author or reviewer’s department, Abstracting & Indexing services and the readership of the publication.<\/p>\n

* The case could be reported to a professional organisation or higher authority for further investigation and action.<\/p>\n","protected":false,"raw":"\u201eLithuanian Musicology\u201c is a periodic scientific journal of the humanities founded in 2000. Every year one volume of the journal is published. Editorial board includes authoritative scientists from Lithuania as well as foreign countries, humanitarians from institutions of different fields. Publications submitted to the journal must be fully original, never published before in other editions. While using other sources as well as other scientific material, the authors must invoke the rules of fair quoting \u2013 cases of plagiarism is unacceptable. The journal protects copyright as well as academic ethics standards. In turn, the editor and editorial board commits not to reveal any information about the submitted papers, with an exception of the author himself, co-authors, reviewers, potential reviewers and other persons related to the publishing (language editors, publishers and etc.). The journal applies the standard of peer review. Reviewers treat papers as confidential documents, peer review relies on the objectivity as well as the clear argumentation.\r\n\r\nIn case of the author noticing fundamental errors left after his paper is published he is obligated to inform the journal's editor and cooperate in the process of correction. The editors and editorial board is not responsible for the opinions, views and contents published in the submitted papers. The responsibility for the originality, veracity and errors lies on the author.\r\n

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement<\/h3>\r\n

PUBLICATION AND AUTHORSHIP<\/h6>\r\n* Editing and publication of the journal Lithuanian Musicology follows the established principles of the academic ethics.\r\n\r\n* Articles previously published elsewhere are not accepted for publication.\r\n\r\n* Plagiarism, i.e. wrong appropriation of somebody else\u2019s text, research methodology, ideas, or results, or presentation of empiric data that has already been introduced into scholarly circulation as new and freshly discovered, or purposeful neglect of proper references is prohibited.\r\n\r\n* The copyrights for all contributions published in the journal Lithuanian Musicology belong to the Lithuanian Academy of Music and Theater; the authors are granted exclusive right to use their works independently of this collective publication.\r\n\r\n* In case of special circumstances causing termination of the journal\u2019s publication, the archive of the former issues is to be preserved and freely available on the Institute\u2019s website.\r\n\r\n* Publication of articles in the journal is free of charge. Authors are not entitled for any financial remuneration for their contributions. A free copy of a relevant issue is provided to all the contributors upon publication.\r\n
AUTHOR RESPONSIBILITIES<\/h6>\r\n* Papers submitted for publication must meet the requirements of research publications and follow the editing principles specified in the Memo for Authors.\r\n\r\n* All authors listed on a paper must have made substantive contributions to the research and writing of the paper.\r\n\r\n* Authors must make sure that all data cited in the article are, to the best of their knowledge, real, accurate, and authentic.\r\n\r\n* Authors must make sure that all sources of financial support for research connected to a paper are acknowledged on publication.\r\n\r\n* Authors are required to take into account the reviewers\u2019 comments regarding soundness of their statements and conclusions, the level of analysis, and other motivated reviewers\u2019 opinions, and correct the indicated mistakes.\r\n
REVIEWING AND THE REVIEWER RESPONSIBILITIES<\/h6>\r\n* Research articles submitted for publication in Lithuanian Musicology are reviewed using peer review method by at least two anonymous reviewers, selected by the Editorial Board from the specialists in the corresponding field. If the reviewers present contrary opinions regarding suitability of the article for publication, the Editorial Board appoints a third reviewer, and after receiving his\/ her conclusions, makes the final decision.\r\n\r\n* The process of reviewing is double-blind, i.e. the reviewers are not aware of the authors\u2019 identity, and vice versa.\r\n\r\n* The reviewers must disclose to the special editor or the Editorial Board any potential conflicts of interest regarding the papers they are asked to referee, including concerns related to funding or their personal objections to the material in question.\r\n\r\n* Reviewers must alert the Editorial Board to any similar or related work already published, which is not cited in the paper in question.\r\n\r\n* Reviewers should treat papers under review as confidential materials. They must not discuss, distribute, or in any way retain copies of papers reviewed.\r\n
EDITORIAL RESPONSIBILITIES<\/h6>\r\n* Editorial Board has final authority to accept or reject a submission.\r\n\r\n* Editors are responsible for recognizing any potential conflict of interest with regard to a submission and should take appropriate action to ensure that these conflicts do not affect a submission\u2019s acceptance or rejection.\r\n\r\n* Editorial Board has to ensure an appropriate level of peer-reviewing and make unbiased decisions with no regard of possible inequity on the part of the reviewers, connected to the author\u2019s gender, sexual orientation, religion, political views and ethnic \/ geographical background.\r\n\r\n* Acceptance of a paper for publication implies confidence in and certainty (to the greatest extent possible) of the validity of the research contained therein.\r\n\r\n* If a material error is discovered in a published paper, the Editorial Board has to ensure that a correction, retraction, or apology, as appropriate and feasible, is published promptly.\r\n
IDENTIFICATION OF UNETHICAL BEHAVIOUR<\/h6>\r\n* Misconduct and unethical behaviour may be identified and brought to the attention of the editor and publisher at any time, by anyone.\r\n\r\n* Misconduct and unethical behaviour may include, but need not be limited to, examples as outlined above.\r\n\r\n* Whoever informs the editor or publisher of such conduct should provide sufficient information and evidence in order for an investigation to be initiated. All allegations should be taken seriously and treated in the same way, until a successful decision or conclusion is reached.\r\n
BREACHES<\/h6>\r\n* Minor misconduct might be dealt with without the wider consultation with author given the chance to respond to any allegations.\r\n\r\n* In case of serious misconduct the editor, in consultation with the publisher or Society as appropriate, should make the decision whether or not to involve the employers, either by examining the available evidence themselves or by further consultation with a limited number of experts.\r\n
OUTCOMES<\/h6>\r\n* In case of misconduct, the author or reviewer should be informed where there appears to be a misunderstanding or misapplication of acceptable standards.\r\n\r\n* The author or reviewer could be given a more strongly worded letter as a warning to future behavior.\r\n\r\n* A formal notice detailing the misconduct could be published.\r\n\r\n* A formal letter could be given to the head of the author's or reviewer's department or funding agency.\r\n\r\n* Formal retraction or withdrawal of a publication from the journal, in conjunction with informing the head of the author or reviewer's department, Abstracting & Indexing services and the readership of the publication.\r\n\r\n* The case could be reported to a professional organisation or higher authority for further investigation and action."},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false,"raw":""},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_lt_post_content":"

Atmintin\u0117 autoriams<\/h3>\r\n\u201eLietuvos muzikologija\u201c yra periodinis humanitarin\u0117s mokslo srities \u017eurnalas, \u012fsteigtas 2000 m. Kasmet i\u0161leid\u017eiamas vienas tomas. \u017durnalo redkolegij\u0105 sudaro autoritetingi Lietuvos ir u\u017esienio specialistai, \u012fvairi\u0173 institucij\u0173 humanitarin\u0117s srities mokslininkai. Mokslo \u017eurnalui pateikiamos publikacijos privalo b\u016bti visi\u0161kai originalios, anks\u010diau nespausdintos kituose leidiniuose. Naudodami \u0161altinius, kit\u0173 mokslo tyrim\u0173 med\u017eiag\u0105, autoriai privalo laikytis vis\u0173 teisingo citavimo reikalavim\u0173 \u2013 plagiato atvejai nepriimtini. \u017durnalas gina autori\u0173 teises ir gerbia akademin\u0117s etikos normas. Savo ruo\u017etu, leidinio redaktorius ir redakcin\u0117 kolegija \u012fsipareigoja neatskleisti jokios informacijos apie pateikt\u0105 straipsn\u012f niekam, i\u0161skyrus pat\u012f autori\u0173, bendraautorius, recenzentus, potencialius recenzentus ar kitus su \u017eurnalo leidyba susijusius \u017emones (kalbos redaktorius, leid\u0117jus ir pan.). \u017durnale taikomas peer review<\/em> standartas, recenzentai straipsnius traktuoja kaip konfidencialius dokumentus, vertindami remiasi objektyvumo standartais, ai\u0161kia argumentacija.\r\n\r\nAutoriui pasteb\u0117jus straipsnyje paliktas fundamentalias klaidas jau po publikavimo, jis yra \u012fpareigojamas apie tai informuoti leidinio redaktori\u0173 ir bendradarbiauti klaid\u0173 taisymo procese. \u017durnalo redaktoriai ir redakcin\u0117 kolegija neatsako u\u017e autori\u0173 straipsniuose i\u0161rei\u0161kiamas nuomones, po\u017ei\u016brius, publikuot\u0173 \u0161altini\u0173 turin\u012f. Atsakomyb\u0119 u\u017e straipsnio originalum\u0105, teisingum\u0105 ir klaidas prisiima pats autorius.\r\n

Teikiam\u0173 publikuoti straipsni\u0173 reikalavimai, j\u0173 recenzavimo tvarka<\/h4>\r\n\u012e \u017eurnal\u0105 priimami tokios arba analogi\u0161kos strukt\u016bros moksliniai straipsniai: \u012fvadas, tyrim\u0173 tikslas, objektas, metodas ir metodikos, gauti rezultatai, i\u0161vados arba apibendrinimas, nuorodos, naudotos literat\u016bros s\u0105ra\u0161as.\r\n\r\nPrie\u0161 pagrindin\u012f tekst\u0105 turi b\u016bti anotacija, kurioje nurodoma: tyrin\u0117jimo objektas, metodas (metodikos), tikslas, i\u0161d\u0117stomi tyrimo rezultatai. Paskui i\u0161vardijami reik\u0161miniai \u017eod\u017eiai. Anotacija turi b\u016bti pateikiama lietuvi\u0173 ir angl\u0173 kalbomis.\r\n\r\nStraipsnio pabaigoje turi b\u016bti pateikiamos nuorodos ir literat\u016bros s\u0105ra\u0161as. Po literat\u016bros s\u0105ra\u0161o pateikiama santrauka. Jei straipsnis lietuvi\u0173 kalba, santrauka ra\u0161oma angl\u0173 kalba; u\u017esienio kalba teikiamo straipsnio santrauka turi b\u016bti lietuvi\u0173 kalba. Santraukos apimtis \u2013 0,5\u20131 puslapis.\r\n\r\nStraipsnio iliustracin\u0117 med\u017eiaga (nuotraukos, grafikai, schemos, lentel\u0117s ir kt.) turi b\u016bti nespalvota, geros kokyb\u0117s ir tinkama reprodukuoti. Nat\u0173 pavyzd\u017eiai turi b\u016bti parengti kompiuteriu.\r\n\r\nStraipsnius galima teikti lietuvi\u0173 ir pagrindin\u0117mis u\u017esienio kalbomis. Apimtis netur\u0117t\u0173 vir\u0161yti vieno autorinio lanko. Didesn\u0117s apimties straipsnio spausdinimo galimyb\u0117 aptariama su vyriausiuoju redaktoriumi.\r\n\r\nStraipsnio autorius atskirame lape lietuvi\u0173 ir angl\u0173 kalbomis turi pateikti trump\u0105 savo mokslin\u0119 biografij\u0105 \u2013 nurodyti mokslin\u012f laipsn\u012f ir vard\u0105, svarbiausius darbus, mokslinius interesus, darboviet\u0119, pareigas ir adres\u0105.\r\n\r\nRedakcijai pagal nurodytus reikalavimus parengt\u0105 straipsn\u012f autorius turi pateikti kompiuterin\u0117je laikmenoje arba elektroniniu pa\u0161tu.\r\n\r\nPateikt\u0105 straipsn\u012f recenzuoja du redakcin\u0117s kolegijos paskirti mokslininkai. Laikomasi nuostatos, kad kiekvienas straipsnis turi tur\u0117ti dvi recenzijas \u2013 vidin\u0119 ir i\u0161orin\u0119. Jeigu pateikto straipsnio problematika tarpdisciplinin\u0117, privaloma gretutin\u0117s mokslo srities ar krypties mokslininko rekomendacija.\r\n\r\nStraipsnis spausdinamas gavus dviej\u0173 mokslinink\u0173 rekomendacijas.\r\n

Bibliografini\u0173 nuorod\u0173 sistemos reikalavimai<\/h4>\r\n\u201eLietuvos muzikologijai\u201c teikiamuose straipsniuose turi b\u016bti laikomasi citavimo tvarkos ir bibliografini\u0173 nuorod\u0173 s\u0105ra\u0161o sudarymo metodikos.\r\n\r\nNuorodose ir literat\u016bros s\u0105ra\u0161e bibliografiniai duomenys pateikiami originalo ra\u0161yba. Dokumentai kirilica nelotyninami (netransliteruojami). Kin\u0173, japon\u0173, arab\u0173 ir kit\u0173 kalb\u0173 \u0161altiniai nurodomi naudojantis atitinkamais transliteravimo standartais. Sulotyninti duomenys gali pakeisti vartotuosius originaliame dokumente arba papildyti \u2013 tuo atveju suskliausti lau\u017etiniais skliaustais. Did\u017ei\u0173j\u0173 raid\u017ei\u0173 ra\u0161yba turi atitikti nurodomo dokumento kalboje susiklos\u010diusi\u0105 praktik\u0105.\r\n\r\nTekstin\u0117s i\u0161na\u0161os \u012fterpiamos \u012f straipsnio tekst\u0105 lenktiniuose skliaustuose arba teikiamos kaip pastaba nuorodose darbo gale. \u012e tekst\u0105 \u012fterptose i\u0161na\u0161ose nurodomas cituojamo teksto autorius arba antra\u0161t\u0117, i\u0161leidimo metai ir \u2013 jei reikia \u2013 puslapis, pavyzd\u017eiui, (\u010ciurlionis 1973: 51). Keli\u0173 autori\u0173 leidinio nuoroda gali b\u016bti trumpinama nurodant pirmojo autoriaus pavard\u0119 ir prira\u0161ant \u201eet al.\u201c Nuorodose teikiami bibliografiniai duomenys nurodomi laikantis citavimo tvarkos ir literat\u016bros s\u0105ra\u0161o sudarymo metodikos.\r\n\r\nLiterat\u016bros s\u0105ra\u0161as turi b\u016bti i\u0161d\u0117stytas autori\u0173 arba antra\u0161\u010di\u0173 ab\u0117c\u0117l\u0117s tvarka. To paties autoriaus darbai ra\u0161omi i\u0161leidimo chronologine tvarka.\r\n

Bibliografin\u0117s nuorodos sudaromos laikantis \u0161i\u0173 reikalavim\u0173:<\/h5>\r\n
    \r\n \t
  1. po autoriaus pavard\u0117s ir vardo dedamas kablelis; po kiekvieno asmenvard\u017eio dedamas kabliata\u0161kis;<\/li>\r\n \t
  2. jei autorius ne\u017einomas, nurodoma antra\u0161t\u0117 (pavadinimas);<\/li>\r\n \t
  3. jei antra\u0161t\u0117s n\u0117ra, ji kei\u010diama pirmaisiais \u017eod\u017eiais, rei\u0161kian\u010diais baigtin\u0119 mint\u012f; po j\u0173 dedamas daugta\u0161kis;<\/li>\r\n \t
  4. toliau eina antra\u0161t\u0117 \u2013 straipsnio arba knygos pavadinimas (kursyvu) originalo kalba;<\/li>\r\n \t
  5. prie\u0161 \u0161altin\u012f, kuriame i\u0161spausdintas straipsnis, ra\u0161oma \u201ein:\u201c; \u0161altinio antra\u0161t\u0117 i\u0161ry\u0161kinama kursyvu.<\/li>\r\n \t
  6. jei esama antra\u0161t\u0117s, t. y. antra\u0161t\u0119 paai\u0161kinan\u010di\u0173 duomen\u0173 (informacija apie leidinio tip\u0105, \u017eanr\u0105, paskirt\u012f, reng\u0117jus), jie teikiami po antra\u0161t\u0117s; prie\u0161 paantra\u0161t\u0119 dedamas dvita\u0161kis;<\/li>\r\n \t
  7. leidinio reng\u0117j\u0173 (redaktori\u0173, vert\u0117j\u0173 ir pan.) nurodyti neprivalu, ta\u010diau jie gali b\u016bti nurodomi po antra\u0161t\u0117s;<\/li>\r\n \t
  8. b\u016btini bibliografijos elementai yra i\u0161leidimo duomenys \u2013 originalo kalba ra\u0161omi duomenys: vieta, leid\u0117jas, metai;<\/li>\r\n \t
  9. po leidinio i\u0161leidimo vietos nuorodos dedamas dvita\u0161kis (kai leid\u0117jas nenurodomas, dedamas kablelis); po dvita\u0161kio toliau ra\u0161omas leid\u0117jas, esant keliems leid\u0117jams \u2013 i\u0161ry\u0161kintasis arba pirmasis leid\u0117jas; po leid\u0117jo \u012fvardijimo dedamas kablelis;<\/li>\r\n \t
  10. toliau nurodomi leidinio metai; esant t\u0119stini\u0173 ar periodini\u0173 leidini\u0173 numeri\u0173, tom\u0173 ir pan. nuorodoms, po leidinio met\u0173 dedamas kablelis; nesant \u0161i\u0173 duomen\u0173, po leidinio met\u0173 dedamas ta\u0161kas, pavyzd\u017eiui:\r\n
    Landsbergis Vytautas, Geresn\u0117s muzikos tro\u0161kimas<\/i>, Vilnius: Vaga, 1990. ISBN 5-415-00635-4.\r\nRa\u010di\u016bnait\u0117-Vy\u010dinien\u0117 Daiva, Vienbalsumas \u0161iaur\u0117s ryt\u0173 Auk\u0161taitijoje: v\u0117lesn\u0117s monofonin\u0117s dainos, in: Lietuvos muzikologija<\/i>, Vilnius: Lietuvos muzikos ir teatro akademija, 2005, t. 6, p. 150\u2013160.<\/blockquote>\r\n<\/li>\r\n \t
  11. toliau nurodomi leidinio dalies (pvz., straipsnio) puslapiai, pavyzd\u017eiui:\r\n
    Kramer Lawrence, Perspektyvos: postmodernizmas ir muzikologija, in: Go\u0161tautien\u0117, R\u016bta (sud.), Muzika kaip kult\u016bros tekstas<\/i>, Vilnius: Apostrofa, 2007, p. 124\u2013160.<\/blockquote>\r\n<\/li>\r\n \t
  12. toliau \u012fra\u0161omas knyg\u0105, daugiatomius arba serialinius leidinius identifikuojantis standartinis numeris \u2013 ISBN, ISMN ar ISSN; po j\u0173 nuorodos dedamas ta\u0161kas; standartinis numeris neprivalomas nurodant knyg\u0173, daugiatomi\u0173 arba serialini\u0173 leidini\u0173 dalis (straipsnius ir pan.);<\/li>\r\n \t
  13. cituojant arba nurodant elektroninius dokumentus, b\u016btina nurodyti leidinio autori\u0173, antra\u0161t\u0119, elektronin\u012f adres\u0105 ir elektroninio leidinio \u017ei\u016br\u0117jimo dat\u0105, pavyzd\u017eiui:\r\n
    Paulauskis Linas, Bronius Kutavi\u010dius: jeigu n\u0117ra paslapties \u2013 n\u0117ra ir muzikos, in: Lietuvos muzikos link<\/i> [interaktyvus], 2005\u20132006, Nr. 11, <http:\/\/www.mxl.lt\/lt\/classical\/info\/251> [\u017ei\u016br\u0117ta 2007 11 05].<\/blockquote>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>","_lt_post_name":"lietuvos-muzikologija-atmintine-autoriams","_lt_post_excerpt":"","_lt_post_title":"Lietuvos muzikologija","_en_post_content":"\u201eLithuanian Musicology\u201c is a periodic scientific journal of the humanities founded in 2000. Every year one volume of the journal is published. Editorial board includes authoritative scientists from Lithuania as well as foreign countries, humanitarians from institutions of different fields. Publications submitted to the journal must be fully original, never published before in other editions. While using other sources as well as other scientific material, the authors must invoke the rules of fair quoting \u2013 cases of plagiarism is unacceptable. The journal protects copyright as well as academic ethics standards. In turn, the editor and editorial board commits not to reveal any information about the submitted papers, with an exception of the author himself, co-authors, reviewers, potential reviewers and other persons related to the publishing (language editors, publishers and etc.). The journal applies the standard of peer review. Reviewers treat papers as confidential documents, peer review relies on the objectivity as well as the clear argumentation.\r\n\r\nIn case of the author noticing fundamental errors left after his paper is published he is obligated to inform the journal's editor and cooperate in the process of correction. The editors and editorial board is not responsible for the opinions, views and contents published in the submitted papers. The responsibility for the originality, veracity and errors lies on the author.\r\n

    Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement<\/h3>\r\n

    PUBLICATION AND AUTHORSHIP<\/h6>\r\n* Editing and publication of the journal Lithuanian Musicology follows the established principles of the academic ethics.\r\n\r\n* Articles previously published elsewhere are not accepted for publication.\r\n\r\n* Plagiarism, i.e. wrong appropriation of somebody else\u2019s text, research methodology, ideas, or results, or presentation of empiric data that has already been introduced into scholarly circulation as new and freshly discovered, or purposeful neglect of proper references is prohibited.\r\n\r\n* The copyrights for all contributions published in the journal Lithuanian Musicology belong to the Lithuanian Academy of Music and Theater; the authors are granted exclusive right to use their works independently of this collective publication.\r\n\r\n* In case of special circumstances causing termination of the journal\u2019s publication, the archive of the former issues is to be preserved and freely available on the Institute\u2019s website.\r\n\r\n* Publication of articles in the journal is free of charge. Authors are not entitled for any financial remuneration for their contributions. A free copy of a relevant issue is provided to all the contributors upon publication.\r\n
    AUTHOR RESPONSIBILITIES<\/h6>\r\n* Papers submitted for publication must meet the requirements of research publications and follow the editing principles specified in the Memo for Authors.\r\n\r\n* All authors listed on a paper must have made substantive contributions to the research and writing of the paper.\r\n\r\n* Authors must make sure that all data cited in the article are, to the best of their knowledge, real, accurate, and authentic.\r\n\r\n* Authors must make sure that all sources of financial support for research connected to a paper are acknowledged on publication.\r\n\r\n* Authors are required to take into account the reviewers\u2019 comments regarding soundness of their statements and conclusions, the level of analysis, and other motivated reviewers\u2019 opinions, and correct the indicated mistakes.\r\n
    REVIEWING AND THE REVIEWER RESPONSIBILITIES<\/h6>\r\n* Research articles submitted for publication in Lithuanian Musicology are reviewed using peer review method by at least two anonymous reviewers, selected by the Editorial Board from the specialists in the corresponding field. If the reviewers present contrary opinions regarding suitability of the article for publication, the Editorial Board appoints a third reviewer, and after receiving his\/ her conclusions, makes the final decision.\r\n\r\n* The process of reviewing is double-blind, i.e. the reviewers are not aware of the authors\u2019 identity, and vice versa.\r\n\r\n* The reviewers must disclose to the special editor or the Editorial Board any potential conflicts of interest regarding the papers they are asked to referee, including concerns related to funding or their personal objections to the material in question.\r\n\r\n* Reviewers must alert the Editorial Board to any similar or related work already published, which is not cited in the paper in question.\r\n\r\n* Reviewers should treat papers under review as confidential materials. They must not discuss, distribute, or in any way retain copies of papers reviewed.\r\n
    EDITORIAL RESPONSIBILITIES<\/h6>\r\n* Editorial Board has final authority to accept or reject a submission.\r\n\r\n* Editors are responsible for recognizing any potential conflict of interest with regard to a submission and should take appropriate action to ensure that these conflicts do not affect a submission\u2019s acceptance or rejection.\r\n\r\n* Editorial Board has to ensure an appropriate level of peer-reviewing and make unbiased decisions with no regard of possible inequity on the part of the reviewers, connected to the author\u2019s gender, sexual orientation, religion, political views and ethnic \/ geographical background.\r\n\r\n* Acceptance of a paper for publication implies confidence in and certainty (to the greatest extent possible) of the validity of the research contained therein.\r\n\r\n* If a material error is discovered in a published paper, the Editorial Board has to ensure that a correction, retraction, or apology, as appropriate and feasible, is published promptly.\r\n
    IDENTIFICATION OF UNETHICAL BEHAVIOUR<\/h6>\r\n* Misconduct and unethical behaviour may be identified and brought to the attention of the editor and publisher at any time, by anyone.\r\n\r\n* Misconduct and unethical behaviour may include, but need not be limited to, examples as outlined above.\r\n\r\n* Whoever informs the editor or publisher of such conduct should provide sufficient information and evidence in order for an investigation to be initiated. All allegations should be taken seriously and treated in the same way, until a successful decision or conclusion is reached.\r\n
    BREACHES<\/h6>\r\n* Minor misconduct might be dealt with without the wider consultation with author given the chance to respond to any allegations.\r\n\r\n* In case of serious misconduct the editor, in consultation with the publisher or Society as appropriate, should make the decision whether or not to involve the employers, either by examining the available evidence themselves or by further consultation with a limited number of experts.\r\n
    OUTCOMES<\/h6>\r\n* In case of misconduct, the author or reviewer should be informed where there appears to be a misunderstanding or misapplication of acceptable standards.\r\n\r\n* The author or reviewer could be given a more strongly worded letter as a warning to future behavior.\r\n\r\n* A formal notice detailing the misconduct could be published.\r\n\r\n* A formal letter could be given to the head of the author's or reviewer's department or funding agency.\r\n\r\n* Formal retraction or withdrawal of a publication from the journal, in conjunction with informing the head of the author or reviewer's department, Abstracting & Indexing services and the readership of the publication.\r\n\r\n* The case could be reported to a professional organisation or higher authority for further investigation and action.","_en_post_name":"lietuvos-muzikologija-atmintine-autoriams","_en_post_excerpt":"","_en_post_title":"","edit_language":"en","_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-90","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/xn--urnalai-cxb.lmta.lt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/90","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/xn--urnalai-cxb.lmta.lt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/xn--urnalai-cxb.lmta.lt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xn--urnalai-cxb.lmta.lt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xn--urnalai-cxb.lmta.lt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/xn--urnalai-cxb.lmta.lt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/90\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/xn--urnalai-cxb.lmta.lt\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}